If a party introduces all or part of a writing or recorded statement, an adverse party may require the introduction, at that time, of any other part—or any other writing or recorded statement—that in fairness ought to be considered at the same time.
Article I. General Provisions
Rule 106. Remainder of or Related Writing or Recorded Statements
Effective January 1, 2014
Opinions in this dataset that cite Rule 106
3 opinions in the dataset cite this rule, reversals first. Matched from each opinion’s coded issue, not from a reading of the opinion.
Reporter citations are as supplied and unverified; the official opinion link is the source of record.
- Brawley v. State267 N.E.3d 1107 unverifiedAffirmed — no errorOn the heat mapOfficial opinion ↗
- Osborn v. State277 N.E.3d 543 unverifiedAffirmed — no errorOn the heat mapOfficial opinion ↗
- Rose v. State272 N.E.3d 977 unverifiedAffirmed — no errorOn the heat mapOfficial opinion ↗
← Rule 105
Limiting Evidence That Is Not Admissible Against Other Parties or for Other PurposesRule 201 →
Judicial Notice
Limiting Evidence That Is Not Admissible Against Other Parties or for Other PurposesRule 201 →
Judicial Notice
Source: the Indiana Rules of Evidence, reproduced for browsing. Rule text as supplied, including the amendment to Rule 103(b) effective July 1, 2026 (Order, Cause No. 26S-MS-8); other rules carry their own effective dates. This is an unofficial copy; check the official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.