AI in Judicial EducationExploratory Project
The worked example

Where evidence rulings are appealed, and where they turn

Every mark is one appellate opinion from a single year. Hover over a mark for a preview; click or tap it for details and a link to the court’s own document. Click a row label to learn about that rule family.

176opinions
8reversed because of an evidence ruling, in whole or in part
63rules, each with its own page

“Reversed” counts opinions where an evidence ruling contributed to reversal. Other opinions were reversed in part on non-evidence grounds such as double jeopardy or fees. Reporter citations are unverified.

Affirmed, no error Raised, not reached Error, but harmless Error, reversible
Read this as a map, not a measurement

The opinions were found by AI-assisted searches and sorted by AI. AI-assisted screening, then a primary-source audit by AI agents (all eight reversals, 12 random criminal opinions and 14 other opinions checked against the court’s own documents); no person has yet read every record, so the rest are screening-grade. Rows with only a few opinions show counts, not rates. What’s checked and what isn’t →